<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CALEWT &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/category/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com</link>
	<description>Citizens Against Lake Erie Wind Turbines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:25:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ontario Rules Out Offshore Wind Projects</title>
		<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/ontario-rules-out-offshore-wind-projects/</link>
		<comments>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/ontario-rules-out-offshore-wind-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's New]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://news.ontario.ca/ene/en/2011/02/ontario-rules-out-offshore-wind-projects.html
In 2006, CALEWT was formed by a group of concerned residents of Essex County in reaction to a proposal to place 119 industrial wind turbines in Pigeon Bay, in the Western Basin of Lake Erie. Our position has always been that a full, non-biased/impartial environmental assessment must be completed before consideration is given to any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mhtml:{19783087-4E44-4515-8D58-8D874D9307BC}mid://00000338/!x-usc:http://news.ontario.ca/ene/en/2011/02/ontario-rules-out-offshore-wind-projects.html" target="_blank">http://news.ontario.ca/ene/en/2011/02/ontario-rules-out-offshore-wind-projects.html</a></p>
<p>In 2006, CALEWT was formed by a group of concerned residents of Essex County in reaction to a proposal to place 119 industrial wind turbines in Pigeon Bay, in the Western Basin of Lake Erie. Our position has always been that a full, non-biased/impartial environmental assessment must be completed before consideration is given to any wind project proposal.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We thought we were successful in convincing the Ontario Government Ministries that this portion of Lake Erie was environmentally too sensitive to proceed without proper due diligence.  As a result, a moratorium was announced in October of 2006.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>That moratorium was lifted in 2008, for reasons unknown to us.</p>
<p>Since that time, we have provided Municipal officials, Provincial and Federal Ministers relevant information, as well as experts, all of which warned that these man made structures could have a significant adverse affect on Pigeon Bay.  We accumulated a tremendous amount of scientific evidence, which was provided to the Ontario Ministers of Environment and Natural Resources, as well as various Federal Departments responsible for our region of the Great Lakes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Our ultimate goal was to have Pigeon Bay designated as an area that would be excluded from consideration for industrial wind development. We believe that independent, non-biased, scientific studies would confirm our view that these structures could have a detrimental effect on water quality, bird migration routes, natural fish habitats, and tourism.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This recent announcement from the Ontario Government seems to indicate that their evaluations have led them to the same conclusion, in that detailed studies must be completed before wind development is allowed on any Ontario fresh water bodies.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We applaud this decision, and hope that this Government, or the others to follow, will live up to this commitment.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>CALEWT will be monitoring future developments relating to off shore wind policy, to ensure that our natural water resource is properly protected for future generations to enjoy.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We would like to thank all those involved for their support over the years.  Your views, comments and contributions have made a significant impact in protecting one of our most precious resources – fresh water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/ontario-rules-out-offshore-wind-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pat Hoy and Bruce Crozier &#8211; OFFSHORE TURBINES COULD HAVE ADDED RESTRICTIONS &#8211; August 19, 2010</title>
		<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/pat-hoy-and-bruce-crozier-offshore-turbines-could-have-added-restrictions-august-19-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/pat-hoy-and-bruce-crozier-offshore-turbines-could-have-added-restrictions-august-19-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 01:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESSEX—Local MPPs Pat Hoy and Bruce Crozier support the Ministry of Natural Resources’ new proposal to consider additional areas to be removed from offshore wind development. Areas that could be removed include those subject to important recreational activities, core commercial fishing activities, navigational lanes and sensitive environmental areas etc.
 
“These proposed rules would ensure that our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESSEX—Local MPPs Pat Hoy and Bruce Crozier support the Ministry of Natural Resources’ new proposal to consider additional areas to be removed from offshore wind development. Areas that could be removed include those subject to important recreational activities, core commercial fishing activities, navigational lanes and sensitive environmental areas etc.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>“These proposed rules would ensure that our that our drinking water and the environment are protected,environmental and ecological areas are further protected,” said Hoy, MPP for Chatham-Kent-Essex.  “‪The Province is inviting comment on potential offshore areas and criteria that should be taken into consideration, which may constrain future development as part of the Crown land application process.”</p>
<p> </p>
<p>“This is yet another clear sign that the government has listened to the residents of my riding and I encourage the public to continue making their views known by commenting on this proposal,” said Bruce Crozier, MPP for Essex. “Until these proposed rules are finalized, the Ministry has deferred the processing of any existing applications and will not be accepting new applications for the use of crown land offshore.”</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed consideration of rules was posted on August 18 by the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) at <a href="http://www.ebr.gov.on.ca/">www.ebr.gov.on.ca</a> and is open for a 47-day public comment until October 4, 2010.  All comments will be considered as part of the decision-making process by MNR if submitted in writing or electronically, with EBR Registry number 011-0907.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The McGuinty government’s Green Energy Act placed a priority on expanding Ontario’s use of clean and renewable sources of energy, to help combat climate change and phase out coal.  Now, the regulatory and policy work is underway to provide further clarity to project proponents and the public to ensure the protection of the environment and ecological sustainability.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On June 25, 2010, the Ministry of Environment posted proposed changes on the Environmental Registry to provide clear, upfront provincial rules for offshore wind facilities, including a 5 km shoreline exclusion zone for offshore turbines, measured from the water’s edge of the Great Lakes and other inland lakes like Lake St. Clair.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Additional background information on Ontario’s Green Energy Act:  <a href="http://www.mei.gov.on.ca/en/energy/gea/">www.mei.gov.on.ca/en/energy/gea/</a>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>─30─</p>
<p align="left">For more information:</p>
<p align="left">Mike Ferguson                                                                                             Darcie Renaud</p>
<p align="left">Office of Pat Hoy, MPP                                                                   Office of Bruce Crozier, MPP</p>
<p>(519) 351-0510                                                                                                      (519) 776-6420</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/pat-hoy-and-bruce-crozier-offshore-turbines-could-have-added-restrictions-august-19-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press Release on Government Proposed Rules for Off-Shore Wind Turbines</title>
		<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/press-release-on-ministry-proposed-rules-for-off-shore-wind-turbines/</link>
		<comments>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/press-release-on-ministry-proposed-rules-for-off-shore-wind-turbines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's New]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To view the press release on the proposed rules for off-shore wind turbines, click HERE.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To view the press release on the proposed rules for off-shore wind turbines, click <a href="http://www.ene.gov.on.ca">HERE</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/press-release-on-ministry-proposed-rules-for-off-shore-wind-turbines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bruce Crozier &amp; Pat Hoy Speak Out About Government Proposal for Off Shore Wind Turbines</title>
		<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/bruce-crozier-pat-hoy-speak-out/</link>
		<comments>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/bruce-crozier-pat-hoy-speak-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's New]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
NO OFFSHORE TURBINES WITHIN 5KM AS
 PROVINCE SEEKS PUBLIC INPUT 
 
For June 25, 2010
 
LEAMINGTON—Local MPPs Pat Hoy and Bruce Crozier said they’re pleased with new rules banning turbines within 5 km of shore, as the Province announced a complete review of where, when and how the government makes Crown land available for off-shore wind projects.
 
“I encourage the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<h1>NO OFFSHORE TURBINES WITHIN 5KM AS</h1>
<h1> PROVINCE SEEKS PUBLIC INPUT<em> </em></h1>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">For </span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">June 25, 2010</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p>LEAMINGTON—Local MPPs Pat Hoy and Bruce Crozier said they’re pleased with new rules banning turbines within 5 km of shore, as the Province announced a complete review of where, when and how the government makes Crown land available for off-shore wind projects.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>“I encourage the public to make their views known. While we’re starting at the 5 km setback limit, we’re also looking at factors like ecological sensitivity, commercial fisheries and transportations routes, which could further restrict development in this area,” said Hoy, MPP for Chatham-Kent-Essex.  “‪Until these rules are final, I will continue to work to ensure that no offshore projects go forward in our community. Today&#8217;s announcement is a sign the government is moving in the right direction.”</p>
<p> </p>
<p>“Today’s announcement is a clear sign that the government has been listening to the concerns of our residents,” said Bruce Crozier, MPP for Essex. “A 5 km setback eliminates any projects that close to shore, including all of the projects currently being proposed for Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair in and around my riding.  I join Pat in saying that, until these rules are final, I will continue to work to ensure that no offshore projects go forward in our community.”</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Ministry of Environment’s proposal, which includes the minimum 5 km shoreline exclusion zone to protect the environment, is posted on the Environmental Registry for public comment for 60 days, ending August 24, 2010.  (<a href="http://www.ebr.gov.on.ca/">www.ebr.gov.on.ca</a> ).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>MNR based the proposed 5km minimum shoreline exclusion zone on safety requirements for drinking water quality, and protection of ecologically sensitive shoreline areas. The shoreline exclusion zone is comparable with those proposed by U.S. states that border the Great Lakes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In addition, the Ministry of Natural Resources is also undertaking a review of Ontario’s process for making Crown land available for off-shore wind projects. The review will include consideration of where, when and how the government makes Crown land available for off-shore wind projects, and may result in additional areas being restricted from future development. No applications for use of offshore land will be considered until the review is complete.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>─30─</p>
<p align="left">For more information:</p>
<p align="left">Mike Ferguson                                                                                              Darcie Renaud</p>
<p align="left">Office of Pat Hoy, MPP                                                                   Office of Bruce Crozier, MPP</p>
<p>(519) 351-0510                                                                                                      (519) 776-6420</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/bruce-crozier-pat-hoy-speak-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the Wacky World of Green Power</title>
		<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/welcome-to-the-wacky-world-of-green-power/</link>
		<comments>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/welcome-to-the-wacky-world-of-green-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this Globe and Mail article &#8220;Welcome to the wacky world of
green power&#8221;, click  HERE.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this Globe and Mail article &#8220;Welcome to the wacky world of<br />
green power&#8221;, click  <a href=" http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/welcome-to-the-wacky-world-of-green-power/article1529760/">HERE</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/welcome-to-the-wacky-world-of-green-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kingsville wind turbines may pose threat to drinking water &#8211; By Sharon Hill, The Windsor Star &#8211; April 2, 2010</title>
		<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/kingsville-wind-turbines-may-pose-threat-to-drinking-water-by-sharon-hill-the-windsor-star-april-2-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/kingsville-wind-turbines-may-pose-threat-to-drinking-water-by-sharon-hill-the-windsor-star-april-2-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 02:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KINGSVILLE &#8212; The construction of offshore wind turbines south of Kingsville could threaten the safety of drinking water for 60,000 people, says Union Water System advisory board manager John Kehoe.
To read more click HERE.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KINGSVILLE &#8212; The construction of offshore wind turbines south of Kingsville could threaten the safety of drinking water for 60,000 people, says Union Water System advisory board manager John Kehoe.</p>
<p>To read more click <a href="http://www.windsorstar.com/Kingsville+wind+turbines+pose+threat+drinking+water/2758169/story.html">HERE</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/kingsville-wind-turbines-may-pose-threat-to-drinking-water-by-sharon-hill-the-windsor-star-april-2-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Town wants regional effort to combat offshore wind turbines By L.G. Karry &#8211; Kingsville Reporter, March 16, 2010</title>
		<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/town-wants-regional-effort-to-combat-offshore-wind-turbines-by-l-g-karry-kingsville-reporter-march-16-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/town-wants-regional-effort-to-combat-offshore-wind-turbines-by-l-g-karry-kingsville-reporter-march-16-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After hearing a report from Town Planner, Danielle Truax regarding the limited and potentially costly remedies available to municipalities with regard to wind power, Kingsville Council has decided to make a concerted, cohesive, and collected effort to deal with matters concerning the potential impact of offshore wind turbines.
   Kingsville has already partnered with the Town [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After hearing a report from Town Planner, Danielle Truax regarding the limited and potentially costly remedies available to municipalities with regard to wind power, Kingsville Council has decided to make a concerted, cohesive, and collected effort to deal with matters concerning the potential impact of offshore wind turbines.</p>
<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 19px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times-Roman', 'Times', 'Times New Roman', 'serif'; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 16px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 36px">   Kingsville has already partnered with the Town of Leamington in hiring the Jones Consulting Group. A report from Jones completed in September 2009, which coordinated technical peer reviews found “significant deficiencies and a lack of specific details to support the conclusions” reached by SouthPoint that “the project would not create a negative environmental impact”.</div>
<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 19px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times-Roman', 'Times', 'Times New Roman', 'serif'; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 16px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 36px">   A more recent proposal by SouthPoint Wind to put up as many as 700 offshore turbines in Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair if their initial proposal for 15 turbines in Pigeon Bay is approved has alerted Council to the fact that they must keep abreast of the process and timelines. At the request of the municipality, SouthPoint has changed the venue from the Kingsville Arena for their March 27th public meeting scheduled from Noon to 2 p.m. to the Lakeside Pavilion at the Park on Queen Street. SouthPoint has acquired the services of Daniel Cherrin to act as their public relations strategist to speak on its behalf. Cherrin was former Detroit Mayor, Ken Cockrel’s chief communications officer.</div>
<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 19px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times-Roman', 'Times', 'Times New Roman', 'serif'; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 16px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 36px">    Ms. Truax provided Council with a recent review of legislation from the Jones Consulting Group, prepared by Ray Duhamel. In it he noted that the Green Energy Act enacted in May of 2009, removed “local planning authority’ for all renewable energy undertakings. According to his report, the role of the municipality was greatly reduced, and proponents only need to consult with municipal officials on a limited number of items. Municipal feedback as part of the Renewable Energy Approval process may include municipal services and infrastructure, the rehabilitation of areas disturbed or damaged during construction, safety protocol, and issues raised during municipal consultation.</div>
<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 19px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times-Roman', 'Times', 'Times New Roman', 'serif'; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 16px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 36px">   Any issues raised after a decision has been made by the Ministry of Environment must prove that the project will cause serious harm to human health or serious and irreversible harm to plant life, animal life or the natural environment. The cost of the studies would be borne by the municipality.</div>
<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 19px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times-Roman', 'Times', 'Times New Roman', 'serif'; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 16px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 36px">   Councillor Tamara Stomp said that the “whole thing is stacked against the municipality” and that the new legislation has taken away municipal and public voice. She said that the government is not providing information as to how the municipality can respond, and “won’t tell you until the report is out there”.</div>
<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 19px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times-Roman', 'Times', 'Times New Roman', 'serif'; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 16px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 36px">   Mayor Nelson Santos agreed that the odds are stacked against the municipality, and he suggested that the municipality not only continue their partnership with Leamington, but also Union Water and the Essex Regional Conservation Authority. Deputy Mayor Katherine Gunning also suggested that the County of Essex be brought into the mix.</div>
<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 19px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times-Roman', 'Times', 'Times New Roman', 'serif'; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 16px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 36px">   Three motions were passed by Council at the March 8th meeting. The first was made by Councillor Stomp to review the budget at the next budget deliberation meeting set for March 29th to accommodate future costs of the studies undertaken by the town with partners. The second was a Notice of Motion, which Councillor Stomp said was also being presented to Amherstburg. It called for local municipalities to have a voice in matters that affect local watershed planning, and the potential impact the offshore turbines may have on water quality, human health and animal and plant life, and that the resolution be forward to the MP and MPP, relevant ministries, all other municipalities in Essex and Windsor and Pelee Island. The motion also asked that the County of Essex, together with all member municipalities, Pelee Island, the City of Windsor and the ERCA be asked to develop a joint regional position regarding offshore wind turbines proposed for the Essex Windsor Region.</div>
<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 19px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times-Roman', 'Times', 'Times New Roman', 'serif'; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 16px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 36px">   Councillor Gord Queen reiterated in his motion, that because the Green Energy Act was in essence “taking away all our rights” he wanted a full environmental assessment to be conducted, and that the Premier of Ontario, the Ontario Power Authority and the Queen as represented by her Ministers be given notice to that affect.</div>
<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 19px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times-Roman', 'Times', 'Times New Roman', 'serif'; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 16px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 36px">   All three motions were passed unanimously.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/town-wants-regional-effort-to-combat-offshore-wind-turbines-by-l-g-karry-kingsville-reporter-march-16-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green act unfair, turbine foes say &#8211; Citizens&#8217; group lacks funds for fight &#8211; By Sharon Hill, The Windsor Star,March 16, 2010</title>
		<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/green-act-unfair-turbine-foes-say-citizens-group-lacks-funds-for-fight-by-sharon-hill-the-windsor-starmarch-16-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/green-act-unfair-turbine-foes-say-citizens-group-lacks-funds-for-fight-by-sharon-hill-the-windsor-starmarch-16-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The province&#8217;s Green Energy Act has hamstrung residents&#8217; ability to fight wind turbine proposals for lakes Erie and St. Clair by putting the financial onus on opponents to prove any harm to human health or the environment.
Municipalities need to do hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of studies to fight 715 wind turbines proposed for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The province&#8217;s Green Energy Act has hamstrung residents&#8217; ability to fight wind turbine proposals for lakes Erie and St. Clair by putting the financial onus on opponents to prove any harm to human health or the environment.</p>
<p>Municipalities need to do hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of studies to fight 715 wind turbines proposed for the two lakes, Gord Meuser, a member of Citizens Against Lake Erie Wind Turbines, told Leamington council Monday.</p>
<p>&#8220;This artificial forest pounded into our bay is just wrong,&#8221; Meuser said.</p>
<p>He said the sad part is the odds are stacked against the citizens and municipalities under the new act.</p>
<p>&#8220;The onus is now on us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meuser was focused just on 165 offshore turbines proposed for Pigeon Bay south of Leamington and Kingsville in three offshore wind farms of 55 turbines each.</p>
<p>But SouthPoint Wind is proposing a total of 715 turbines for Lake Erie south of Chatham-Kent and Essex County and for Lake St. Clair north of Lakeshore.</p>
<p>The Essex Region Conservation Authority is working with local municipalities to see what studies should be done and how much that could cost.</p>
<p>The conservation authority could know the cost within a few days and will meet with municipal representatives again.</p>
<p>Tracey Pillon-Abbs, manager of planning services for Leamington, told council depending on the number of municipalities involved in the cost sharing, the estimated cost could be $5,000 to $10,000 per municipality.</p>
<p>SouthPoint Wind has not applied to the province for the offshore wind turbines. It has scheduled a series of public meetings for March 27 and has a draft application on its website.</p>
<p>Coun. Rick Atkin said he hoped the thinking that the province is going to ram the offshore wind farms on municipalities is wrong.</p>
<p>Leamington Deputy Mayor Rob Schmidt said adequate studies have not been done and the same concerns that at one time saw the province place a moratorium on offshore wind farms are still valid now.</p>
<p>The ban that had been put in place after reaction to SouthPoint Wind&#8217;s proposal for 15 offshore turbines in 2006 was lifted in 2008.</p>
<p>Coun. John Paterson said he hoped municipalities could stop the access to the power grid on land. &#8220;It&#8217;s our natural resource. We&#8217;re a waterfront community. Why would we want this destroyed by a wind farm,&#8221; Paterson said.</p>
<p>Council agreed with a motion by Schmidt to ask staff to draft a resolution to send to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario to research other options to control green energy projects since it has no power under the Green Energy Act. Schmidt doesn&#8217;t want inappropriate uses and conflicts with neighbours over wind turbines and solar projects.</p>
<p>When talking offshore turbines, Meuser said some people assume the 715 turbines is some sort of joke.</p>
<p>But he said there will be offshore turbines in the lakes if research isn&#8217;t done to prove there could be negative impacts.</p>
<p>He urged residents to show up for a March 27 meeting in Leamington at the Princess Centre. SouthPoint Wind is holding public meetings across Essex County that day including one at the Lakeside Park pavilion in Kingsville from noon to 2 p.m.</p>
<p>For more information see www.southpointwind.com.</p>
<p>Other hour-long meetings March 27 include an 8:30 a.m. meeting at the Puce Sports and Leisure Centre, a 6 p.m. meeting at the Harrow arena and a 7:30 p.m. meeting at the Amherstburg Recreation Centre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/green-act-unfair-turbine-foes-say-citizens-group-lacks-funds-for-fight-by-sharon-hill-the-windsor-starmarch-16-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle lines drawn in lake turbine issue, By Ellen van Wageningen, The Windsor StarMarch 12, 2010</title>
		<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/battle-lines-drawn-in-lake-turbine-issue-by-ellen-van-wageningen-the-windsor-starmarch-12-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/battle-lines-drawn-in-lake-turbine-issue-by-ellen-van-wageningen-the-windsor-starmarch-12-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A Leamington-based company that is proposing to put 700 wind turbines in lakes Erie and St. Clair has hired a high-profile Michigan public relations strategist and former spokesman for the mayor of Detroit.
Daniel Cherrin, who was chief communications officer under former Detroit mayor Ken Cockrel Jr., said Thursday he was hired last week by SouthPoint [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="page1">
<p>A Leamington-based company that is proposing to put 700 wind turbines in lakes Erie and St. Clair has hired a high-profile Michigan public relations strategist and former spokesman for the mayor of Detroit.</p>
<p>Daniel Cherrin, who was chief communications officer under former Detroit mayor Ken Cockrel Jr., said Thursday he was hired last week by SouthPoint Wind to speak on its behalf about the controversial project.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think there&#8217;s a lot of emotions on both sides. &#8230; And it&#8217;s a very small community and a lot people are friends,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>But the company intends to work with the affected communities and will hold more public meetings after the ones that it has scheduled for March 27, Cherrin said.</p>
<p>SouthPoint is waiting to see the Ministry of Environment&#8217;s guidelines for offshore wind turbines before submitting an application under Ontario&#8217;s new Green Energy Act, he said. &#8220;But they&#8217;ll consult with the public and business community before they submit any application.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cherrin, a lawyer who also has a public relations firm, said he approached SouthPoint because he is interested in issues relating to the environment and harnessing the potential of the Great Lakes. He said is still getting up to speed on the project, for which SouthPoint has put together a 120-page draft proposal, and expects to be involved in the March 27 public meetings and beyond.</p>
<p>Cherrin, who named his public relations firm North Coast Strategies because of its Michigan location at the centre of the Great Lakes, is also a lawyer &#8212; though he is not acting in that capacity for SouthPoint.</p>
<p>From September 2008 to May 2009 he was chief of communications for Cockrel Jr. following the tumultuous tenure of disgraced mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, who left office after pleading guilty to criminal charges related to a text messaging scandal.</p>
<p>Cherrin was also lead federal lobbiest for the Detroit Regional Chamber of Commerce in its efforts to keep commercial traffic following across the Canada-U.S. border after 9-11. His firm has worked with the University of Windsor to increase its profile in Michigan and, in the past, for the Detroit-Windsor Tunnel Corporation.</p>
<p>He steps into a public relations breach for SouthPoint, which is owned by the Liovas family that has been involved in construction and development in Essex County for many years. The wind company has been mum since revealing its latest proposal on its website last month.</p>
<p>The majority of the 700 turbines for the 1,400-megawatt project would be in Lake Erie south of Essex County and Chatham-Kent.</p>
<p>Leamington Mayor John Adams and Kingsville Mayor Nelson Santos told a breakfast meeting of the Leamington and District Chamber of Commerce Thursday that their towns are joining forces to make their case against the project. Essex County council will be asked to take a position and put money into challenging the SouthPoint application, said Santos, who is also county warden.</p>
<p>He criticized SouthPoint for not being more forthcoming.</p>
<p>&#8220;They&#8217;re really being cautious in what access the public has to them and that&#8217;s a real concern,&#8221; Santos said. The town asked the company to move its March 27 public meeting in Kingsville from a room at the arena to the Lakeside Park Pavilion to accommodate more people, he said.</p></div>
<div id="page2">
<p>Residents and town officials in Leamington and Kingsville are familiar with SouthPoint, which since 2006 has been trying to get approval to put 15 wind turbines offshore in Lake Erie.</p>
<p>While the Leamington district chamber won&#8217;t take an official position, most members that have sought the organization&#8217;s backing fear the negative effects of SouthPoint&#8217;s proposal, said president Nick Mastronardi.</p>
<p>All 55 members who attended the breakfast Thursday indicated they can&#8217;t support the plan based on what they have been told to date.</p>
<p>&#8220;A small contingent&#8221; of companies that would benefit from construction work have spoken in favour of the plan by SouthPoint, which is not a chamber member, he said.</p>
<p>- &#8211; -</p>
<p>PUBLIC MEETINGS</p>
<p>SouthPoint Wind will hold the following public meetings March 27 about its proposal:</p>
<p>- 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. at the Puce Sports and Leisure Centre, 962 Old Tecumseh Rd., Lakeshore.</p>
<p>- Noon to 2 p.m. at the Lakeside Park Pavilion, 325 Queen St., Kingsville.</p>
<p>- 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. at the Princess Centre, 33 Princess St., Leamington.</p>
<p>- 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the Harrow arena, 243 McAffee St.</p>
<p>- 7:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Amherstburg Recreation Centre, 179 Victoria St. S.</p>
<p>- 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. at the Wheels Inn, 615 Richmond St., Chatham.</p>
<p>For more details see www.southpointwind.com.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/battle-lines-drawn-in-lake-turbine-issue-by-ellen-van-wageningen-the-windsor-starmarch-12-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>700 wind turbines proposed for local lakes &#8211; by Sharon Hill</title>
		<link>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/700-wind-turbines-proposed-for-local-lakes-by-sharon-hill/</link>
		<comments>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/700-wind-turbines-proposed-for-local-lakes-by-sharon-hill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Seven hundred offshore wind turbines are being proposed for Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair including 165 turbines north of Lakeshore and wind farms off Amherstburg, Colchester, Kingsville and Leamington.
SouthPoint Wind of Leamington had already proposed 15 turbines in three spots off the shores of Kingsville and Leamington. If SouthPoint gets approval for that project, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="page1">
<p>Seven hundred offshore wind turbines are being proposed for Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair including 165 turbines north of Lakeshore and wind farms off Amherstburg, Colchester, Kingsville and Leamington.</p>
<p>SouthPoint Wind of Leamington had already proposed 15 turbines in three spots off the shores of Kingsville and Leamington. If SouthPoint gets approval for that project, it is proposing a 1,400-megawatt project with 13 wind farms: three in Lake St. Clair and the rest south of Essex County and Chatham-Kent in Lake Erie. Each wind farm could have 55 turbines and could be one to 2.5 kilometres from shore.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why should we be the guinea pigs?&#8221; Leamington Deputy Mayor Rob Schmidt said Wednesday.</p>
<p>If it could be the first offshore wind farm anywhere in fresh water, there should be more research done, Schmidt said.</p>
<p>There are offshore wind farms proposed on the Great Lakes including Lake Ontario, but none approved or constructed in the province.</p>
<p>&#8220;On something that has this many potential negative impacts, we don&#8217;t want to be the first ones,&#8221; Schmidt said, citing concerns over drinking water intake pipes, tourism and wildlife from migrating birds to the commercial and sports fisheries.</p>
<p>SouthPoint Wind representatives wouldn&#8217;t talk to a reporter Wednesday but in a news release said the project would be &#8220;the first of many new offshore generation plants in the Great Lakes region.&#8221;</p>
<p>The news release went on to say &#8220;the development of this project will bestow the community with first mover status in the offshore wind energy market, undoubtedly creating a succession of job growth and manufacturing expansion in surrounding areas.&#8221;</p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t say how much it would cost. SouthPoint Wind is one of a group of companies owned by the Liovas family of Leamington.</p>
<p>The company is advertising public meetings March 27 and its interest in both the 15-turbine project and the 700-turbine project. The news release said the company is following the legislation of the province&#8217;s new approval process which will involve &#8220;assessing the feasibility of a sustainable&#8221; 15-turbine project.</p>
<p>Kingsville Coun. Tamara Stomp said she was &#8220;reeling from shock&#8221; that the provincial government would allow the proposal to be suggested.</p>
<p>So far, the provincial government didn&#8217;t seem to know the details. SouthPoint Wind&#8217;s advertising said the notice of the public meeting has to go forward before submitting an application. There is a draft application on its website.</p>
<p>Kate Jordan, a spokeswoman with the Ministry of the Environment, said there are several offshore wind proposals in the planning stages in Ontario and the province is still working on regulations for offshore developments under the new Green Energy Act.</p>
<p>In the past, such projects went through environmental assessments but that process is being streamlined under the new act. So far only the land-based regulations for wind farms have been developed, Jordan said.</p>
<p>The process for the offshore wind farms would involve first going to the Ministry of Natural Resources to get permission to build on the Crown lakebed. Then a proponent would go through the renewable energy approval process under the Green Energy Act of the Ministry of the Environment. She said it&#8217;s up to proponents to study the project and identify any negative environmental impacts and ways to overcome them. Public consultations must be held.</p></div>
<div id="page2">
<p>Any approval would have to come from the Ministry of the Environment. For now, Jordan said it would be a site specific review if the company applied.</p>
<p>If allowed, a draft application on SouthPoint Wind&#8217;s website said the wind farm construction could begin in 2012 and last until December 2014.</p>
<p>Municipalities were concerned that under the new act, they don&#8217;t have control over whether a project is approved. Schmidt said SouthPoint Wind had not fully answered questions and concerns posed to the company under the old regulations.</p>
<p>The Ontario Commercial Fisheries Association hasn&#8217;t taken a stand on turbines in Lake Erie but had not been persuaded the wind farms wouldn&#8217;t be bad for the fishery in the last proposal, said association executive director Peter Meisenheimer.</p>
<p>&#8220;Everybody always knew it wasn&#8217;t about 15 turbines.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meisenheimer said people figured once the turbines were built, the company would want to add to the wind farms and the association has been paying close attention to the issue with members expressing &#8220;deep concern.&#8221;</p>
<p>In 2006, opposition to offshore turbines in Lake Erie saw the provincial government ban offshore developments. But the ban was lifted by 2008 and the Citizens Against Lake Erie Wind Turbines fought the proposal again. September meetings in Kingsville and Leamington on the 15 turbines attracted more than 100 people. Under the old approval process, those councils wanted the provincial government to do an independent environmental assessment.</p>
<p>Gord Meuser, a member of Citizens Against Lake Erie Wind Turbines, said the concerns for Pigeon Bay off Point Pelee are the same regardless of the number of turbines.</p>
<p>The 15-turbine proposal sparked a petition with about 6,000 names, but now the group will have to start again from scratch. Meuser, like others interviewed Wednesday, had not had the chance to read the draft proposals on the company&#8217;s website.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lakeeriewindturbines.com/700-wind-turbines-proposed-for-local-lakes-by-sharon-hill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

